I was on Lightroom, today, comparing pictures sync’d from Lightroom on my iPad with RAW files imported directly into Lightroom from an sd-card. Try as I might, I could not make adjustments to the RAW file match the settings of the one sync’d… until… (tl;dr, skip to the bottom)
First, I should describe the “mobile” work-flow:
- Picture shot, RAW, on a Canon EOS dSLR
- Used wi-fi to transfer the image to my iPad with the Canon EOS Remote app and save desired images to the Camera Roll
- Opened the image in Lightroom Mobile on the iPad, edited, and made it available via cloud-synching
- I made adjustments to the image. I always enabled Lens Correction, but that never seemed to affect images. I assume the lens information was lost when images were saved as JPEG to the iPad.
Once I got home, I imported the RAW files directly into Lightroom Desktop:
- Used Lightroom import to add the images to a Catalog. I applied metadata defaults (name, copyright, etc.) and enable Lens Correction, during import
- Ensured that Lightroom Mobile images were synched
Comparing and Matching
I was then able to compared the two images on the big screen. I expected differences since I’d adjusted the images independently and due to the differences between JPEG and RAW—the image coming from the iPad was JPEG.
I was curious to see how different my adjusts to the same image may have been. I was surprised to discover that the differences weren’t only due to my editing choices.
Cropping and Lens Corrections
With both images in Desktop Lightroom, I noticed that I’d cropped the images differently. This direct comparison, when switching between the two images, more difficult. I liked the JPEG crop better, so I applied those to the RAW version.
Since I had made Lens Correction and Transform adjustments on the raw image, the images still didn’t match. So, I applied the Lens Corrections and Transform settings to the JPEG version. The JPEG version didn’t have information about the lens used; so I had to manually set the Lens Profile settings. Now the images were aligned.
…Almost: later, I found a better match if I adjusted the Lens Correction Distortion to 120, on the RAW version. Then, if the goal is to match the images (rather than remove lens vignetting), I found that I needed to jack the Vignette setting to 100 on the JPEG and down to 20 on the RAW image.
Because Lightroom Mobile’s ability to perform proper Lens Correction against JPEGs imported from an external camera, these last adjustments should probably be avoided when Lightroom’s adjustments on the RAW image are accurate. For the purposes of accurate comparison between the JPEG and RAW edits, this was necessary.
The color was obviously different; the desktop version was over-saturated. So, I started over by using the Sync feature in the Develop module to apply the adjustments from the mobile image to desktop image. Still, the images did not match.
Then I remembered the Camera Calibration Profile setting.
Camera Calibration Profiles and Picture Styles
The camera can be set to define foundational settings for images which affect sharpness, contrast, saturation and color response, among other things. Canon calls them Picture Styles (Nikon calls them Picture Controls).
It is important to know that these settings directly affect how JPEG images are created but do not affect the image pixels that are saved into RAW images. The setting is saved as metadata of the RAW file as a hint to how the image pixels, later (when converting to a JPEG, for example).
|Lightroom Camera Calibration Profile||Canon Picture Style||Nikon Picture Control|
Lightroom simulates these settings for RAW images under Camera Calibration, Profile. It lists “Adobe Standard” along with selections that correspond to those that the camera offers (for Canon and Nikon, at least).
JPEG files do not allow this to be changed and only lists “Embedded” as the sole option. When I sync’d the settings, earlier, there was no corresponding Profile in the JPEG image to apply to the RAW image, so Lightroom assigned Adobe Standard to the RAW image.
After setting each of the Profiles’ various “Camera …” settings, I found Camera Standard to be the closest match; this even though I’d shot the images with my camera set to Faithful.
Admittedly, I was gauging comparisons by the red mailbox which was the most prominent feature in this picture. I could still see differences in the brightness curve between the RAW and mobile versions. I’ll leave brightness curve and broader color response for another day.
Mobile RAW Handling
The EOS Remote app does not copy RAW files from the camera. In order to streamline in-the-field Lightroom work and make it more consistent with desktop processing, a Lightning to SD Card Camera Reader for iPhone and iPad should enable Lightroom Mobile work with RAW files, natively.
Without additional hardware or a laptop, Lightroom Mobile is not able to work with Canon RAW files, so matching edits made in the field with RAW files, later, can be a challenge. Here are some tips to simplifying the process:
Assuming you have a Canon camera with wifi support and an iOS phone or tablet:
- Use the EOS Remote iOS app to transfer images to the iOS device
- Use Lightroom Mobile to edit, adjust and sync the images
- On a desktop, import RAW images to Lightroom Desktop
- Wait for Lightroom Mobile images to sync
- Find RAW images matching the sync’d files
- Enable Lens Corrections, as desired, and manually set Lens Profile values for the images originating in Lightroom Mobile
- Sync all settings from the sync’d images to their RAW counterparts
- Consider changing the RAW image’s Lens Correction Distortion to 120 and Vignetting to 0, or set it to 20 and set the mobile image to 100, if the goal is to match the images (otherwise leave the RAW Len Corrections alone).
- Set Camera Calibration to “Camera Standard” (for images originating on Canon EOS cameras)
Let me know whether this works for you and what additional adjustments you found to improve the accuracy of transferring adjustments made in Lightroom Mobile to RAW image counterparts in Lightroom Desktop.
This site has long needed an upgrade… it is supposed to be a photo site, after all, so it should show off more of my photos. Well, I finally built a piece that evolution: photo albums. It will allow me to make larger sets of my work viewable by others.
The page works on a mobile device quite nicely, if I do say so myself. When viewing an album’s thumbnails, you can click on any image to see it full-screen. On a mobile device, you can swipe through the images, full-screen.
A lot of people expressed interest in the pictures I shot of the West Seattle bantam Wildcats, jr. football team, so those are most of the pictures that are there, now, until I better organize them.
There are lots of changes coming to the album feature. Please feel free to call, email, or comment on what you like or don’t like about this.
If you are interested in adding this feature into your website, contact me.
I’ve been getting into car-culture, lately. Well, you know, most of these machines still take old dinosaurs to keep them running. So when we stopped by an old station that was still selling gallons, less than 18¢ per, we had to fill up.
There was a cutie manning the pump, so I couldn’t resist the fill-up.
I spent several days trying to sort through the process for officially registering a set of images with the U.S. Copyright Office. An implicit copyright belongs to the photographer (most of the time), but registering with the Copyright Office further improves your protection, should you ever need to take legal action against an infringer.
Fortunately, the Copyright Office allows you to register any number of images at once—a single fee— but it does not allow you to submit published and unpublished works in the same collection; yet they do not define, very thoroughly, what constitutes a published work. Because laws always lag behind technology, they have not been updated to address Internet photo postings. I had posted some images on Facebook (and my personal Facebook page) and on my blog.
How To Register Images with the Copyright Office
I was going to detail each step of the copyrighting process, but ASMP‘s Step by step tutorial for online registration already documents it thoroughly. Instead, I will simply note some issues that took me a little digging to find.
- Photographs fall under the category “Work of the Visual Arts” according to the US Copyright office.
- You will need to distinguish between published and unpublished images.
- Most experts consider that the public posting of images (on Facebook, Instagram, blog, etc.) to be considered “published.”
- For unpublished, images, their copyright date is the date that the images were taken.
- For published images, registered within 3-months of their creation, their copyright date is their date of creation.
- For published images, registered more than 3-months after their creation, their copyright date is the date of registration.
- Any number of images that can be submitted to the Copyright Office, limited by their upload time of 1-hour (the images can be “zipped” into a single file or sets of files).
- Many photographers make it a habit to register their images every 3-months in aggregates.
- The U.S. Copyright Office has a strict list of password requirements, when creating an account, but they do not state a maximum password length; if you are having a problem creating your account, try a shorter password (I had trouble creating an account until I truncated my password to 8-characters).
- US Copyright Office — index of notes, definitions, and instructions
- “Copyright Basics” — US Copyright Office
- “Copyright Registration Pictorial, Graphic, Sculptural Works” — US Copyright Office
- “Jarvis v. K2” — Chase Jarvis Blog
- “Registering Your Copyrights Using the eCO System“
- “Photography and Copyright Law” — Ken Kaminesky Photography Blog
On my last afternoon in the Philippines, my attention was caught by some jeepnieyses off the side of the road (as I wrote about in my last post). As I stopped to take pictures, kids came out of no where, surrounding me and, with no discernible English, wanted me to take their pictures. One thing about the Philippines: if you have a camera, children (and groups of working men) love to have their pictures taken. Another note about the Philippines that I rarely experience in my travels, Filipinos always return a sincere smile when you smile at them—anywhere in the islands (rather than a suspicious sneer that you will get elsewhere in the world).
As I left the little kids, none of whom spoke more than a word of English I heard one of the smaller one say “Facebook?” I confirmed what he said and wrote my Facebook ID on his arm. He hasn’t friended me yet.
The little kids induced me off the main road, so I continued on. I happened upon a rec-area that included a basketball court; but what intrigued me, in an alcove under a trellis covering, was the poor-man’s billiards table: a hard, polished wood surface with 4-holes, in each corner. Instead of balls, the game used 12 flat 1″ plastic disks and a 3″ cue-disk. Here, the older kids hustled each other for games (actually they played for bragging rights more than money). Their champ beat me one-handed.
I continued deeper into what turned out to be, a living community. A paved narrow road separated a row of tiny (American livingroom-sized) ad hoc constructions from a (polluted) river. The road was barely wide enough to accommodate a vehicle—everyone has to move entirely off the pavement when one passed by. Many of the houses had their “dirty-kitchen” on the riverbank, opposite their house. I couldn’t tell whether this was because there was not enough room in the house, to keep the heat out, or just to keep the fire from burning down their little dwelling. I’m sure no tourists have ever wandered down this path.
I happened upon a group of fraternity kids (“kids”?) drinking for one of their birthdays. They weren’t too old to relish having their pictures taken. At their age they were very curious about relating to foreigners. We shared our knowledge of celebs and politicos, theirs being, of course, Manny “Pacman” Pacquiao (boxing world champ turned politician and world’s 2nd highest earning athlete, 2012). I am a little out of it when it comes to pop-celebs these days, but fortunately I was up on Psy’s “Gangnam Style”; they went crazy with excitement when I mentioned that.
These diversions during travels are what make travel interesting. For better or (not in my experience) worse, I rarely feel fear during my meanderings. When I came across the partiers, they were wondering how I got there and were concerned about my safely. “Don’t go down any further,” they warned me. Ironically, that is when I felt suspicious… even of them—every bad slasher/travel movie came to mind. I’m kind of curious what was further down the road since I would have continued down the road had it not been for their warning. It was getting dark and I had to go back to the hotel and meet my friends, so that is a question that was left unanswered. Continue Reading
For you cord-cutting, 21st-century modern folk, you may have dispensed with tangible business cards. Today, the world—the people you interact with—is not “connected” enough to rely on sharing contact information paperlessly. Here are some points to consider when building your new business cards.
It was my last day in the Philippines, this past January. Since my flight was to leave at 6am, I stayed in Manila the night before. I had the afternoon to waste and the hotel directed me somewhere and recommended I take a taxi. On the map, it didn’t look very far, so I grabbed my camera and hoofed it. As usually happens, on my way toward a destination, I got distracted and detoured… through a community that I’m sure no tourists ever visit. Continue Reading
Winter is a great time to tool around. It is quiet; meaning no people, no crowds. I was finally on my way to Crater Lake (Oregon), on my drive back home from Klamath Falls (I’ve passed by twice before; last year I was almost stranded in snow at the closed north entrance). Crater Lake is north of Klamath Falls, a significant detour from the fastest way home. The detour took even longer as I kept stopping on the 30 mile road to the crater. Most of the way in were summer park-resorts and farms—all quieted by the summer snow. Even the winter trees were sleeping.
Klamath Falls, Oregon — It was cold; I had a jacket on and it was cold. There were patches of snow, here and there that didn’t appear to be melting anytime soon. Though it was clear and sunny, the constant strong-breeze kept the bite sharp. And it was in those wintery conditions that Gabby volunteered to for a photo-shoot—in here dainty stylized ballet/tutu thing; mostly bare legs arms and back. My jacket wasn’t enough to keep me warm, but Gabby’s youth kept her warm …initially.
I was tagging along with my good friend Michelle Cuello (about whom, I need to write a separate post about) on her photo-shoot of Gabby Inscoe (18yo), a budding photographer in her own right. Did I mention it was cold, up in the hills, just north of town? The cold finally worked its way to Gabby’s bones and she couldn’t pose anymore without goosebumps. Making her way back to the car, she didn’t need to act the misery that she’d been enduring. What an enthusiastic trooper she was!
I was going to help shoot my aunt and uncle’s 50th anniversary event. I didn’t really know what would be going on and I thought it might be an opportunity to augment ambient light via a my eTTL flash. I have a 2 ft. long, stretchy off-camera cable Pixel eTTL Off-Camera Shoe Cord (a $20+ replacement for the $65+ Canon OC-E3 “Off Camera Shoe Cord 3”). But 2–3ft away from the camera was not interesting, so I thought I would do a little hacking to make it easy to move the flash as far away as I would like. Here’s a little “hotel-room hackery” on how I turned my short extension into a modular long extension. The same hack can be applied to a similar Nikon 4765 SC-28 TTL 9-ft. Remote (or compatible) cord. Continue Reading
A business needs to have an identity—talking-heads call this “branding.” The most important, is its name. Photographers are artists and artists often do not think of themselves business people—even recoiling from the idea. But, even if you are not planning on earning money from your photography, if you want to become recognized for your work, you must create a consistent identity. I am going through the process myself, so I will try to give you some insights into my thought processes. Continue Reading
I finally got to loading the Magic Lantern firmware onto my Canon T1i/500D and I am so excited! Magic Lantern is a firmware add-on for Canon dSLRs that enhances their use. It does not replace the camera’s built-in firmware, so you can use the camera as expected. It can be easily bypassed, too, so you needn’t be afraid to try it out. If I had known how easy this all was, I would have tried it years ago.
Magic Lantern adds capabilities that Canon doesn’t provide, relaxes unnecessary limits, and provides a bunch of convenience features that would take a lot of thought and pushing of buttons to configure. It unlocks advanced features to Canon’s entry- and mid-level dSLRs (currently, T1i/500D, T2i/550D, T3i/600D, 50D, and 60D, and separately 5D Mk II), making them more usable. Arguably, many of the features should have been included in the camera from the factory.
The Magic Lantern web-site has sufficient explanation of installing and using the firmware, but I thought I would lend a bit of personal insight to encourage you to try it. Continue Reading
Too Many Choices
I’ve gone through this once before, trying to decide on a digital SLR. The first time around, I would start with the affordable models; as I thumbed through the catalogs, I’d find myself lusting the ones thousands of dollars more than I wanted to spend. Years passed. I tried to make do with non-SLR digital cameras but would never feel the satisfaction I’d remembered with film SLRs.
As the years passed, the selection of camera companies (and therefore, camera models) broadened, making the choice even more difficult. There are a lot of great, innovative SLR camera companies out there (e.g., Sony, Pentax, Olympus). So many, I made the nearly arbitrary decision to narrow it down to Nikon and Canon, the two most prolific SLR manufacturers of professional quality SLRs over the past several decades. Continue Reading